deviant art

Deviant Login Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Shop Similar Prints
This Print Not Available
Download Image
JPG, 1200×472
more ▶

More from ~Luftwaffles

Featured in Groups:

Details

May 28, 2007
194 KB
1200×472
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 49
Favourites: 125 [who?]

Views: 6,108 (0 today)
Downloads: 1,460 (0 today)
[x]
:iconluftwaffles:
Rudel's ride of choice. Iv'e always thought Stukas were cool looking.. apparently the population at large seems to think they are ugly? Whatever :P

Anyway... an attempt at vector art.... I didnt realize this stuff was so difficult and time consuming. Hopefully it doesn't suck too bad; it's kinda cartoony.

More info if you're interested: [link]
Add a Comment:
 
love 1 1 joy 1 1 wow 1 1 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconragnarok6664:
~Ragnarok6664 Aug 28, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Ah a tank buster? Two flak-guns there right? The problem with ju-87 was its vulnerability to airsuperiority fighters, still a great dive bomber.

Ups, nice work*
Reply
:iconblitz190:
I like the cartoony look it makes it look like its in a show or somthing I like it
Reply
:iconmedjugore:
~Medjugore Jul 11, 2012  Student Traditional Artist
Damn great good looking Stuka! Hey, i think this dive bomber is the "second skin" of Rudel when you browse into his total WW2 score. Spendid!
Reply
:iconnightraven1:
~NightRaven1 May 31, 2011  Hobbyist Artisan Crafter
amazing piece of work
Reply
:iconhermiteese:
really beautiful!
Reply
:iconroach88:
Awesome! they do like badass!
Reply
:iconsoldierman14:
~Soldierman14 May 10, 2010  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Nicely done!
Reply
:iconblackout177:
Mood: Love ~Blackout177 Apr 19, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
the Stuka had to be one of the best dive bombers in WW2; i rate it as second to the Japanese Aichi D3A Val
Reply
:iconparady:
not ugly at all ,pretty neat for a fast dive bomber :P
Reply
:iconcrypto-137:
~Crypto-137 Feb 26, 2010  Hobbyist Photographer
It is ugly indeed, that's the beautiful thing about them.
Reply
Add a Comment: